Validation results

These results come from validating WebLens against expert manual review, finding by finding. See Accuracy & confidence for how to read precision, recall, and F1, and how they map to each criterion's tag.

Overall

56%

Precision

78%

Recall

65%

WebLens catches the large majority of real issues. The remaining flagged candidates are quick to confirm or clear in a short triage pass.

Per-criterion (33 validated)

Criterion	Category	Prec.	Recall	F1	Tag
Links clearly convey their purpose	Labels and wording	100%	100%	100%	High accuracy
Pages have multiple access paths	Sensory and cognitive	100%	100%	100%	High accuracy
Instructions don't rely on visual cues or sound	Sensory and cognitive	100%	100%	100%	High accuracy
Content Follows Logical Order with Screen Readers	Other assistive technologies support	100%	100%	100%	High accuracy
Elements Have Clear Names and Roles for Accessibility	Other assistive technologies support	100%	86%	92%	High accuracy
Focus Indicator is Clearly Visible on All Elements	Keyboard navigation	100%	80%	89%	High accuracy
Graphics have clear contrast against background	Colour	70%	88%	78%	Medium accuracy
Focus follows a logical reading order	Keyboard navigation	91%	67%	77%	Medium accuracy
Content readable at 400% zoom without scrolling	Zoom, gestures & customization	67%	67%	67%	Medium accuracy
Text has adequate color contrast for readability	Colour	100%	40%	57%	Use with care
Text is not embedded in images	Images and graphics	17%	100%	29%	Use with care
Forms clearly show required fields and highlight errors	Error prevention and recovery	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
All Functions Accessible via Keyboard Only	Keyboard navigation	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
Moving content can be paused or hidden easily	Sensory and cognitive	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
Content structure matches visual presentation	Other assistive technologies support	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
Hover Content Stays Visible Until Closed	Zoom, gestures & customization	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
New users quickly grasp system use	Learnability	92%	100%	96%	High accuracy
Content is visually organized and aligned	Visual Design	75%	100%	86%	High accuracy
Clear guidance and feedback during tasks	Guidance and Feedback	75%	100%	86%	High accuracy
Tasks are easy to complete without confusion	Ease of Use	56%	83%	67%	Medium accuracy
Visual cues predict system behavior	Visual Design	50%	100%	67%	Medium accuracy
Clear and Intuitive Navigation Pathways	Navigation	46%	100%	63%	Medium accuracy
Interactions are easy and intuitive to use	Ease of Use	71%	56%	63%	Medium accuracy
Consistent Use of Terms and Labels	Consistency	33%	100%	50%	Use with care
System gives clear feedback for actions and errors	Guidance and Feedback	33%	100%	50%	Use with care
Feedback is clear and helps correct errors	Guidance and Feedback	33%	75%	46%	Use with care
Content Structure is Logical and Easy to Navigate	Navigation	29%	100%	44%	Use with care
Design and style are uniform across the platform	Consistency	25%	100%	40%	Use with care
Visual Design Effectively Highlights Key Information	Visual Design	29%	50%	36%	Use with care
App responds quickly to user actions	Efficiency	17%	100%	29%	Use with care
Design elements behave consistently across the app	Consistency	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
User flow is simple and intuitive	Ease of Use	0%	0%	0%	Use with care
Easy and Clear Navigation Between Sections	Navigation	0%	0%	0%	Use with care